In economics and finance , risk aversion is the behavior of humans especially consumers and investors , when exposed to uncertainty , to attempt to reduce that uncertainty. It is the reluctance of a person to accept a bargain with an uncertain payoff rather than another bargain with a more certain, but possibly lower, expected payoff.

For example, a risk-averse investor might choose to put his or her money into a bank account with a low but guaranteed interest rate, rather than into a stock that may have high expected returns, but also involves a chance of losing value.

Practicality investing in low risk profile commodities. A person is given the choice between two scenarios, one with a guaranteed payoff and one without. However, individuals may have different risk attitudes.

The dollar amount that the individual would accept instead of the bet is called the certainty equivalent , and the difference between the expected value and the certainty equivalent is called the risk premium. For risk-averse individuals, it is positive, for risk-neutral persons it is zero, and for risk-loving individuals their risk premium is negative. In expected utility theory, an agent has a utility function u x where x represents the value that he might receive in money or goods in the above example x could be 0 or Time does not come into this calculation, so inflation does not appear.

An agent possesses risk aversion if and only if the utility function is concave. For instance u 0 could be 0, u might be 10, u 40 might be 5, and for comparison u 50 might be 6.

Hence the certainty equivalent is The utility function for perceived gains has two key properties: There are multiple measures of the risk aversion expressed by a given utility function.

Several functional forms often used for utility functions are expressed in terms of these measures. However, since expected utility functions are not uniquely defined are defined only up to affine transformations , a measure that stays constant with respect to these transformations is needed. One such measure is the Arrow—Pratt measure of absolute risk-aversion ARA , after the economists Kenneth Arrow and John W.

Pratt , [4] [5] also known as the coefficient of absolute risk aversion , defined as. The solution to this differential equation omitting additive and multiplicative constant terms, which do not affect the behavior implied by the utility function is:. The Arrow-Pratt measure of relative risk-aversion RRA or coefficient of relative risk aversion is defined as [10].

This measure has the advantage that it is still a valid measure of risk aversion, even if the utility function changes from risk-averse to risk-loving as c varies, i.

A constant RRA implies a decreasing ARA, but the reverse is not always true. In intertemporal choice problems, the elasticity of intertemporal substitution often cannot be disentangled from the coefficient of relative risk aversion. The isoelastic utility function. A time varying relative risk aversion can be considered. The most straightforward implications of increasing or decreasing absolute or relative risk aversion, and the ones that motivate a focus on these concepts, occur in the context of forming a portfolio with one risky asset and one risk-free asset.

Thus economists avoid using utility functions, such as the quadratic, which exhibit increasing absolute risk aversion, because they have an unrealistic behavioral implication.

In monetary economics, an increase in relative risk aversion increases the impact of households' money holdings on the overall economy. In other words, the more the relative risk aversion increases, the more money demand shocks will impact the economy. In modern portfolio theory , risk aversion is measured as the additional expected reward an investor requires to accept additional risk.

Here risk is measured as the standard deviation of the return on investment, i. In advanced portfolio theory, different kinds of risk are taken into consideration. They are measured as the n-th root of the n-th central moment.

The symbol used for risk aversion is A or A n. The notion of using expected utility theory to analyze risk aversion has come under criticism from behavioral economics. Matthew Rabin has showed that a risk-averse, expected-utility-maximizing individual who,. Rabin criticizes this implication of expected utility theory on grounds of implausibility. One solution to the problem observed by Rabin is that proposed by prospect theory and cumulative prospect theory , where outcomes are considered relative to a reference point usually the status quo , rather than to consider only the final wealth.

Another limitation is the reflection effect which demonstrates the reversing of risk aversion.

This effect was first presented by Kahneman and Tversky as a part of the prospect theory , in the behavioral economics domain. The reflection effect is an identified pattern of opposite preferences between negative prospects as opposed to positive prospects. According to this effect, people tend to avoid risks under the gain domain, and to seek risks under the loss domain.

Meaning, no risk aversion is expected under the loss domain. When posing the same problem under the loss domain - with negative values, most people prefer a loss of with 80 percent chance, over a certain loss of The reflection effect as well as the certainty effect is inconsistent with the expected utility hypothesis.

It is assumed that the psychological principle which stands behind this kind of behavior is the overweighting of certainty.

Risk Aversion Definition | Forex Glossary by rehojuvuyequ.web.fc2.com

Meaning, options which are perceived as certain, are over-weighted relative to uncertain options. This pattern is an indication of a risk seeking behavior in negative prospects and eliminates other explanations for the certainty effect such as aversion for uncertainty or variability.

The initial findings regarding the reflection effect faced criticism regarding its validity, as it was claimed that there are insufficient evidence to support the effect on the individual level. Subsequently, an extensive investigation revealed its possible limitations, suggesting that the effect is most prevalent when either small or large amounts and extreme probabilities are involved. Attitudes towards risk have attracted the interest of the field of neuroeconomics and behavioral economics.

Risk Averse

A study by Christopoulos et al. In the real world, many government agencies, e. Health and Safety Executive , are fundamentally risk-averse in their mandate. This often means that they demand with the power of legal enforcement that risks be minimized, even at the cost of losing the utility of the risky activity. It is important to consider the opportunity cost when mitigating a risk; the cost of not taking the risky action.

Writing laws focused on the risk without the balance of the utility may misrepresent society's goals. The public understanding of risk, which influences political decisions, is an area which has recently been recognised as deserving focus.

Error (Forbidden)

David Spiegelhalter is the Winton Professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at Cambridge University , a role he describes as "outreach". A vaccine to protect children against the three common diseases measles, mumps and rubella was developed and recommended for all children in several countries including the UK.

However, a controversy arose around fraudulent allegations that it caused autism. This alleged causal link was thoroughly disproved, [21] and the doctor who made the claims was expelled from the General Medical Council. Even years after the claims were disproved, some parents wanted to avert the risk of causing autism in their own children. They chose to spend significant amounts of their own money on alternatives from private doctors. These alternatives carried their own risks which were not balanced fairly, most often that the children were not properly immunized against the more common diseases of measles, mumps and rubella.

Mobile phones may carry some small [22] [23] health risk. While most people would accept that unproven risk to gain the benefit of improved communication, others remain so risk averse that they do not. The COSMOS cohort study continues to study the actual risks of mobile phones. A recent experimental study with student-subject playing the game of the TV show Deal or No Deal finds that people are more risk averse in the limelight than in the anonymity of a typical behavioral laboratory.

In the laboratory treatments, subjects made decisions in a standard, computerized laboratory setting as typically employed in behavioral experiments. In the limelight treatments, subjects made their choices in a simulated game show environment, which included a live audience, a game show host, and video cameras.

Risk aversion has been shown to be influenced by demographic characteristics. For instance, older people tend to be more risk averse than younger, poorer people more risk averse than richer in financial decisions and female more risk averse than men. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. For the related psychological concept, see Risk aversion psychology. Utility function of a risk-averse risk-avoiding individual.

Utility function of a risk-affine risk-seeking individual. CE - Certainty equivalent ; E U W - Expected value of the utility expected utility of the uncertain payment; E W - Expected value of the uncertain payment; U CE - Utility of the certainty equivalent; U E W - Utility of the expected value of the uncertain payment; U W 0 - Utility of the minimal payment; U W 1 - Utility of the maximal payment; W 0 - Minimal payment; W 1 - Maximal payment; RP - Risk premium.

Why Good Managers Make Poor Project Choices. Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude. Journal of Corporate Finance. The Theory of Risk Aversion. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing , Markham Publ. Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty Second ed. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Mathematics for Economists Student ed.

A Bayesian application to the Eurozone , Journal of Macroeconomics , vol. An analysis of decision under risk". Journal of the econometric society. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. Journal of risk and uncertainty. CAM - the Cambridge Alumni Magazine.

The University of Cambridge Development Office. Archived from the original PDF on March 9, N Engl J Med. Review of Economics and Statistics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Do the Slow Die First? Review of Financial Studies.

Economic theory Econometrics Applied economics. Adaptive expectations Aggregate demand Balance of payments Business cycle Capacity utilization Capital flight Central bank Consumer confidence Currency Demand shock Depression Great Depression DSGE Economic growth Economic indicator Economic rent Effective demand General Theory of Keynes Hyperinflation Inflation Interest Interest rate Investment IS—LM model Microfoundations Monetary policy Money NAIRU National accounts PPP Rate of profit Rational expectations Recession Saving Shrinkflation Stagflation Supply shock Unemployment Macroeconomics publications.

Aggregation problem Budget set Consumer choice Convexity Cost—benefit analysis Deadweight loss Distribution Duopoly Economic equilibrium Economic shortage Economic surplus Economies of scale Economies of scope Elasticity Expected utility hypothesis Externality General equilibrium theory Indifference curve Intertemporal choice Marginal cost Market failure Market structure Monopoly Monopsony Non-convexity Oligopoly Opportunity cost Preference Production set Profit Public good Returns to scale Risk aversion Scarcity Social choice theory Sunk costs Supply and demand Theory of the firm Trade Transaction cost Value Uncertainty Utility Microeconomics publications.

Agricultural Business Demographic Development Economic history Education Environmental Financial Health Industrial organization International Knowledge Labour Law and economics Monetary Natural resource Public Service Urban Welfare. Behavioral economics Computational economics Econometrics Economic systems Experimental economics Mathematical economics Methodological publications.

Ancient economic thought Austrian school of economics Chicago school of economics Classical economics Feminist economics Heterodox economics Institutional economics Keynesian economics Mainstream economics Marxian economics Neoclassical economics Post-Keynesian economics Schools overview.

Notable economists and thinkers within economics. Kenneth Arrow Gary Becker Francis Ysidro Edgeworth Milton Friedman Ragnar Frisch Friedrich Hayek Harold Hotelling John Maynard Keynes Tjalling Koopmans Paul Krugman Robert Lucas Jr. Jacob Marschak Alfred Marshall Karl Marx John von Neumann Vilfredo Pareto David Ricardo Paul Samuelson Joseph Schumpeter Amartya Sen Herbert A.

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Economic Cooperation Organization European Free Trade Association International Monetary Fund Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development World Bank World Trade Organization.

Category Index Lists Outline Publications Business and economics portal. Retrieved from " https: Actuarial science Behavioral finance Financial risk modeling Utility. Navigation menu Personal tools Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in.

Views Read Edit View history. Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia store. Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact page. Tools What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Page information Wikidata item Cite this page.

This page was last edited on 28 May , at Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers Contact Wikipedia Developers Cookie statement Mobile view.